Thursday, April 25, 2013
A Nobel prizewinner argues for an overhaul of the theory of consumer choice
"To take one example, the “people” in economic models have fixed preferences, which are taken as given. Yet a large body of research from cognitive psychology shows that preferences are in fact rather fluid."
"Biologists have a much clearer understanding of altruism and kindness, whether to kin or strangers, than economists, who typically emphasise the dogged pursuit of self-interest."
"Economists tend to think that more choice is good. Yet people with many options sometimes fail to make any choice at all."
"Explicitly modelling the process of making a choice might prompt economists to take a more ambiguous view of an abundance of choices. It might also make them more sceptical of “revealed preference”, the idea that a person’s valuation of different options can be deduced from his actions. This is undoubtedly messier than standard economics. So is real life."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

0 comments:
Post a Comment